<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2015 Federal Budget: What it Means to You</title>
	<atom:link href="https://granttrainingcenter.com/blog/2015-federal-budget-means/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://granttrainingcenter.com/blog/2015-federal-budget-means/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 23:32:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenda Stuckey</title>
		<link>https://granttrainingcenter.com/blog/2015-federal-budget-means/#comment-57730</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brenda Stuckey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 01:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://granttrainingcenter.com/blog/?p=188#comment-57730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to know how would I apply or sign up for federal government grants]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to know how would I apply or sign up for federal government grants</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayra</title>
		<link>https://granttrainingcenter.com/blog/2015-federal-budget-means/#comment-47172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mayra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://granttrainingcenter.com/blog/?p=188#comment-47172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;After all, for these rewards it is rlealy YOU as the PI that&#039;s being funded. The research you propose is more an example of what you can do than anything.&quot;I don&#039;t think so.Bob:  &quot;I don&#039;t see how this wastes anyone&#039;s time unless the proposal is clearly inappropriate for one of the agencies.&quot;The problem is if everyone takes all their proposals and sends them everywhere, which they would if this practice were encouraged.  The NSF panel I was on a few years ago would have had 200 rather than 100 proposals to evaluate every six months, plus the headache of trying to figure out what all the other panels had done with those same 200 proposals.  Not to mention the lunacy of having to solicit multiple rounds of outside reviews, doubling everyone&#039;s review loads.  All to distribute no more money.One can spot duplicity via the current &amp; pending.  It would be foolhardy to submit duplicate proposals that neglect to mention each on the other C&amp;P.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;After all, for these rewards it is rlealy YOU as the PI that&#8217;s being funded. The research you propose is more an example of what you can do than anything.&#8221;I don&#8217;t think so.Bob:  &#8220;I don&#8217;t see how this wastes anyone&#8217;s time unless the proposal is clearly inappropriate for one of the agencies.&#8221;The problem is if everyone takes all their proposals and sends them everywhere, which they would if this practice were encouraged.  The NSF panel I was on a few years ago would have had 200 rather than 100 proposals to evaluate every six months, plus the headache of trying to figure out what all the other panels had done with those same 200 proposals.  Not to mention the lunacy of having to solicit multiple rounds of outside reviews, doubling everyone&#8217;s review loads.  All to distribute no more money.One can spot duplicity via the current &amp; pending.  It would be foolhardy to submit duplicate proposals that neglect to mention each on the other C&amp;P.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
